From c06763a0207dde7f2060f7b1670a0b99298a01f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "John R. Lenton" Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 17:29:16 +0000 Subject: This implements a better (more python-conformant) list.sort. It's not really about that, though; it's about me figuring out a sane way forward for keyword-argument functions (and function metadata). But it's useful as is, and shouldn't break any existing code, so here you have it; I'm going to park it in my mind for a bit while sorting out the rest of the dict branch. --- py/objtuple.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'py/objtuple.c') diff --git a/py/objtuple.c b/py/objtuple.c index ceca4200e4..2205b869c5 100644 --- a/py/objtuple.c +++ b/py/objtuple.c @@ -97,8 +97,8 @@ static mp_obj_t tuple_getiter(mp_obj_t o_in) { } const mp_obj_type_t tuple_type = { - { &mp_const_type }, - "tuple", + .base = { &mp_const_type }, + .name = "tuple", .print = tuple_print, .make_new = tuple_make_new, .binary_op = tuple_binary_op, @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ const mp_obj_type_t tuple_type = { static const mp_obj_tuple_t empty_tuple_obj = {{&tuple_type}, 0}; const mp_obj_t mp_const_empty_tuple = (mp_obj_t)&empty_tuple_obj; -mp_obj_t mp_obj_new_tuple(uint n, mp_obj_t *items) { +mp_obj_t mp_obj_new_tuple(uint n, const mp_obj_t *items) { if (n == 0) { return mp_const_empty_tuple; } @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ mp_obj_t mp_obj_new_tuple(uint n, mp_obj_t *items) { return o; } -mp_obj_t mp_obj_new_tuple_reverse(uint n, mp_obj_t *items) { +mp_obj_t mp_obj_new_tuple_reverse(uint n, const mp_obj_t *items) { if (n == 0) { return mp_const_empty_tuple; } @@ -163,8 +163,8 @@ static mp_obj_t tuple_it_iternext(mp_obj_t self_in) { } static const mp_obj_type_t tuple_it_type = { - { &mp_const_type }, - "tuple_iterator", + .base = { &mp_const_type }, + .name = "tuple_iterator", .iternext = tuple_it_iternext, .methods = {{NULL, NULL},}, }; -- cgit v1.2.3