From 1a7892414e654aa5c99efa31db767baba7f4a424 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joongi Kim <joongi@lablup.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 01:01:41 +0900
Subject: bpo-45416: Fix use of asyncio.Condition() with explicit Lock objects
 (GH-28850)

Co-authored-by: Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com>
---
 Lib/asyncio/locks.py | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'Lib/asyncio/locks.py')

diff --git a/Lib/asyncio/locks.py b/Lib/asyncio/locks.py
index a7453fb1c77..4fef64e3921 100644
--- a/Lib/asyncio/locks.py
+++ b/Lib/asyncio/locks.py
@@ -230,8 +230,6 @@ class Condition(_ContextManagerMixin, mixins._LoopBoundMixin):
         super().__init__(loop=loop)
         if lock is None:
             lock = Lock()
-        elif lock._loop is not self._get_loop():
-            raise ValueError("loop argument must agree with lock")
 
         self._lock = lock
         # Export the lock's locked(), acquire() and release() methods.
-- 
cgit v1.2.3